Important Key Notes on Railway Act 1989 

Here is an expanded article on the Railways Act, 1989 with more detailed explanations and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) in English. This is useful for aspirants preparing for RRB, SSC, UPSC, and other government exams.

---

🚆 Railways Act, 1989 – Detailed MCQ-Based Article

---

🔍 Overview of the Railways Act, 1989

The Railways Act, 1989 is the principal legislation governing the operation, management, regulation, safety, and penalties related to Indian Railways. It replaced the Railways Act of 1890 and came into effect on 1 July 1989. This Act includes provisions for:

• Construction and maintenance of railways

• Regulation of railway tariffs and services

• Passenger responsibilities and liabilities

• Safety and accident-related compensation

• Offences and penalties

• Establishment of Railway Claims Tribunal (RCT)

---

🧠 MCQs with Explanations on the Railways Act, 1989

---

1. When did the Railways Act, 1989 come into effect?

A. 1 January 1989
B. 1 April 1989
C. 1 July 1989
D. 15 August 1989
✅ Correct Answer: C. 1 July 1989
📘 Explanation: The Act was passed on 3 June 1989 and enforced from 1 July 1989.

---

2. The Railways Act, 1989 replaced which earlier Act?

A. Railways Act, 1853
B. Railways Act, 1879
C. Railways Act, 1890
D. Railways Act, 1951
✅ Correct Answer: C. Railways Act, 1890
📘 Explanation: The new act modernized and replaced the outdated provisions of the Railways Act of 1890.

---

3. Under which section is the definition of “Railway” given in the Act?

A. Section 2
B. Section 3
C. Section 5
D. Section 10
✅ Correct Answer: A. Section 2
📘 Explanation: Section 2 (31) contains definitions of key terms like railway, railway administration, etc.

---

4. Which authority is established for dealing with claims related to accidents or loss of goods?

A. Railway Board
B. Railway Tribunal
C. Railway Claims Tribunal
D. Consumer Forum
✅ Correct Answer: C. Railway Claims Tribunal
📘 Explanation: Established under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 to handle compensation claims.

---

5. What is the penalty for traveling without a valid ticket under Section 138?

A. ₹100
B. Twice the fare or ₹250, whichever is higher
C. ₹1,000
D. Imprisonment for 3 months
✅ Correct Answer: B. Twice the fare or ₹250, whichever is higher
📘 Explanation: Penalty aims to deter unauthorized travel.

---

6. Section 145 of the Railways Act deals with:

A. Ticketless travel
B. Use of narcotics
C. Drunken behavior in trains
D. Vandalism
✅ Correct Answer: C. Drunken behavior in trains
📘 Explanation: Section 145 penalizes intoxicated and indecent conduct in railway premises.

---

7. Under which section is damage to railway property punishable?

A. Section 150
B. Section 152
C. Section 160
D. Section 170
✅ Correct Answer: B. Section 152
📘 Explanation: Willful destruction of railway property can lead to imprisonment up to 5 years.

---

8. Which section deals with false alarm or bomb threat in railway premises?

A. Section 145
B. Section 146
C. Section 154
D. Section 165
✅ Correct Answer: C. Section 154
📘 Explanation: Hoax calls or false threats are punishable under this section to ensure public safety.

---

9. What is the punishment for obstructing train services under Section 174?

A. ₹500 fine only
B. Up to 2 years imprisonment and fine
C. No punishment
D. Community service
✅ Correct Answer: B. Up to 2 years imprisonment and fine
📘 Explanation: Obstructing train operations is treated as a serious offence.

---

10. Which section provides guidelines on loss, damage, or non-delivery of consignments?

A. Section 73
B. Section 93
C. Section 100
D. Section 110
✅ Correct Answer: D. Section 110
📘 Explanation: This section covers liability of the railway administration regarding consignments.

---

11. The Railway Protection Force (RPF) operates under which Ministry?

A. Ministry of Defence
B. Ministry of Railways
C. Ministry of Home Affairs
D. Ministry of Transport
✅ Correct Answer: B. Ministry of Railways
📘 Explanation: RPF is directly under the administrative control of the Ministry of Railways.

---

12. Which of the following is a civil liability under the Railways Act?

A. Traveling without ticket
B. Damage to railway property
C. Claim for damaged goods
D. Drunken behavior
✅ Correct Answer: C. Claim for damaged goods
📘 Explanation: Compensation claims are civil in nature and are handled by the RCT.

---

13. What is the name of the body responsible for policymaking in Indian Railways?

A. Railway Tribunal
B. Railway Board
C. Transport Commission
D. Planning Commission
✅ Correct Answer: B. Railway Board
📘 Explanation: The Railway Board is the top-level decision-making body in the Ministry of Railways.

---

14. Offences under the Railways Act are:

A. Civil
B. Criminal
C. Both Civil and Criminal
D. Administrative only
✅ Correct Answer: C. Both Civil and Criminal
📘 Explanation: The Act includes provisions for both types, including fines, imprisonment, and compensation.

---

📋 Key Features of the Railways Act, 1989

Feature	Details
Enacted	3 June 1989
Came into force	1 July 1989
Replaced	Railways Act, 1890
Governs	Railway operations, passenger safety, freight, liability, offences
Tribunals	Railway Claims Tribunal (under separate 1987 Act)
Administered by	Ministry of Railways
Penalty sections	137–176
Total Chapters (approx.)	19
Major areas	Ticketing, freight, safety, offences, civil claims, train operations

---

📌 Want More?

Here are some important case laws related to the Railways Act, 1989, which have shaped the legal interpretation of passenger rights, liability, and the duties of Indian Railways. These are especially useful for judicial exams, UPSC, and railway law-related interviews.

---

⚖️ Important Case Laws Related to the Railways Act

---

1. Union of India vs. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar (2008) 9 SCC 527

Issue: Death due to electrocution while boarding a train – Is it an "untoward incident"?

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that the death was an "untoward incident" under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act and the claimant was entitled to compensation.

✅ Importance:
This case clarified that accidental electrocution on railway premises falls under untoward incidents for which compensation is payable under Section 124-A.

---

2. Jameela vs. Union of India (2010) 12 SCC 443

Issue: Passenger fell off a moving train – Is it a case of negligence?

Judgment:
The Court ruled that falling from a running train is also considered an untoward incident. Even if the passenger was negligent, compensation cannot be denied unless it was a case of suicide or self-inflicted injury.

✅ Importance:
It emphasized that strict liability applies under Section 124-A, and fault of the deceased is not always a bar to compensation.

---

3. Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar Ghosh (AIR 1984 SC 1262)

Issue: Delay in train service and loss to the passenger – Who is liable?

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that the Railways are not liable for delay, unless it results from negligence or misconduct.

✅ Importance:
This case clarifies the limited liability of Indian Railways in cases of service delay unless gross negligence is proven.

---

4. Union of India vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (1997) 8 SCC 683

Issue: Who is liable for goods damaged during railway transit?

Judgment:
It was held that the Railways act as a bailee (Section 73 of the Railways Act), and they are liable for loss unless they can prove that it was not due to their negligence.

✅ Importance:
Clarified the bailee responsibility of Railways and highlighted their duty to protect goods in transit.

---

5. Smt. Poonam Kumari vs. Union of India (2016) – Patna High Court

Issue: Death due to slipping while boarding – Is it covered under untoward incident?

Judgment:
The High Court ruled that slipping while boarding a train is covered under the definition of untoward incident and compensation must be paid.

✅ Importance:
This case reinforced the passenger protection scope under Sections 123 and 124A.

---

6. Union of India vs. Rina Devi (2018) 3 SCC 1

Issue: Theft of luggage – Is compensation payable?

Judgment:
The Court held that theft or robbery of passenger luggage is not an untoward incident under Section 123(c), and no automatic compensation is payable unless railway negligence is proven.

✅ Importance:
It sets a precedent that compensation is not always available in property loss unless negligence is established.

---

7. Raj Kumar vs. Union of India (2008) – Delhi High Court

Issue: Passenger got injured due to overcrowding in a train.

Judgment:
The Court ruled in favor of the claimant and held that the Railways failed in their duty of care by allowing extreme overcrowding.

✅ Importance:
Established that Railways can be held responsible for not managing crowd control properly.

---

📝 Summary Table

Case Name	Key Legal Principle
Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar Case	Electrocution = untoward incident
Jameela Case	Falling from train ≠ bar to compensation
Sunil Kumar Ghosh Case	Delay ≠ compensation unless negligence
United India Insurance Case	Railways = bailee of goods
Poonam Kumari Case	Slipping while boarding = compensation
Rina Devi Case	Theft ≠ untoward incident
Raj Kumar Case	Overcrowding injury = railway’s liability

---